Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, eLearning has been booming. When students, teachers, and corporate learners were forced to take to their laptops to continue their educations, many people discovered the benefits of online learning.
Since then, as with remote work, we haven’t looked back. Online learning has revolutionized the way we learn, and the onset of AI has only made it clearer that new ways of teaching and learning are here to stay.
e-Learning is the process of using digital tools like laptops, smartphones, and other devices to deliver and absorb educational content. e-Learning, or online learning, allows content to be delivered to a wider audience of students, making learning more accessible.
Beyond that, EdTech (education technology) can improve processes like grading and managing students in traditional educational institutions. Many schools today now use a hybrid of in-class and remote learning to serve their students, and faculty and staff are well-versed in using digital tools for their administrative needs.
Technology like Zoom and online classrooms have vastly improved facilitation of conversation between students and teachers. Teachers can now easily answer students’ questions and make those answers available for every student in the class.
Interactive classrooms, virtual reality, and simple access to knowledge encourages students’ engagement and drives deep, committed learning. Automated report generation and real-time feedback also improve student accountability and allow teachers to easily catch students who may be falling behind.
EdTech makes it possible to distribute customized lesson plans and tailored content. With the rise of AI, the ease of personalizing student learning has only increased. As systems learn how students learn, plans become more specific and relevant to students’ needs.
Assessing students and providing real-time feedback has never been easier, and teachers often find they have more time to devote to lesson-planning and conversation with students once they adopt e-Learning tools and technologies.
As AI makes its way into our educational systems and training tools, it will shape the future of education in massive, groundbreaking ways. Students are already reaping the benefits of smart digital systems that learn as they learn and are able to customize content and lesson plans to fit a student’s specific needs.
For example, two students in the same mathematics class might have vastly different skill levels when it comes to grasping new topics. One student may be at the top of the class while the other is struggling. For these students, customized approaches delivered through artificial intelligence allow them to learn at their own pace, while simultaneously freeing the teacher up to address the concerns of the majority of students.
Additionally, AI can be used to help teachers innovate new lesson plans, to streamline admissions and other administrative procedures, and generally to free up staff and faculty to spend more time with students and less time on paperwork.
Some of the top eLearning tools available today, evaluated for their practicality, ease of use, and customer support.
Kami is leading the way when it comes to revolutionary education technology tools. A collaborative document platform, it allows multiple users to view, edit, and share the same document, making it a favorite among teachers looking for a quick and easy way to share resources and grade students’ assignments.
Although not specifically made to address educational concerns, Kami has quickly become a dominant player in the EdTech space, due to its easy-to-use interface, outstanding support, and widespread adoption. It also integrates seamlessly with Google Drive, making it an invaluable tool for any institution utilizing Google’s Workspaces.
Kahoot allows teachers to create interactive quizzes and games for their classrooms. Surveys, pop-quizzes and even exams can be delivered through the platform, as well as check-ins and other items that gamify learning and make it fun.
EdPuzzle is similar to Kahoot but allows teachers the additional step of making video content to deliver to students. This is extremely useful for creating follow-up lessons or study guides, or for making lectures accessible for students who are unable to attend in-person classes due to disability or other extenuating circumstances.
Videos and quizzes can be added from multiple sources, including National Geographic and TED, giving instructors access to a broad range of resources their students might not otherwise have available to them.
The world is changing, and education is changing with it. Students need to be equipped to live in a primarily digital world, and EdTech platforms provide the opportunity for them to get familiar with online collaboration and work tools in a controlled environment. Beyond the classroom, eLearning tools provide corporations with scalable solutions for training and onboarding employees.
Whether you are a student seeking access to knowledge, a teacher hoping to streamline your workflow, or a business hoping to improve your employees’ productivity and upward mobility, EdTech and eLearning tools can help you do it.
With so many companies embracing the rise of AI and scrambling to incorporate AI into their tech stacks, it was only a matter of time before the role of Chief AI Officer became a thing. In 2024, President Joe Biden introduced a mandate that government agencies name a Chief AI Officer who would be responsible for managing the innovation and risk posed by AI.
Since then, most agencies have complied with the mandate, some by naming an entirely new official, others by rolling the responsibilities into existing roles. But are any private companies incorporating this role into their executive suite, and does your company need to do the same?
Here are some frequently asked questions about a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) to help you determine if your company could benefit from having one.
A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) is the person responsible for overseeing the integration of AI into an organization’s machinery. An August 2023 survey of 965 companies found that more than 10% had already hired a CAIO and that another 21% were actively trying to fill the role.
The role is primarily meant to mitigate issues like solution fragmentation (a common occurrence when a particular technology has no executive oversight) and allow companies to create cohesive roadmaps for the use of artificial intelligence within their organizations.
A Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer must also be well-versed in navigating the global regulatory environment, as regulations around AI are still very much in their formative states and are ever-changing. In addition to understanding AI regulation, the CAIO should also be up to date on privacy regulations and data concerns.
Finally, a CAIO should be equipped to manage the ethical considerations of using AI and should be able to speak and act knowledgeably and sensitively when addressing these considerations.
| CDO (Chief Data Officer) | CAIO (Chief AI Officer) |
|---|---|
|
|
There is no single set of criteria for having or creating a CAIO role within your business. The decision to do so should be based on the particular needs of your business.
In recent years, Generative AI development has turbo-charged, primarily because of the plummeting cost of computing power improvements in deep learning methodologies. The power of Gen AI is having a massive impact on business operation models and offers the opportunity for existing CDOs and CAOs to take on CAIO roles and tasks.
If your company already has a CDO or CDAO and you are finding that AI integrations into your tech stack are becoming difficult to manage, splintering, or experiencing communication breakdowns, it may be time to think about incorporating a CAIO into your team.
If the artificial intelligence systems being developed involve many stakeholders, a Chief AI Officer can bring the pieces together and advocate for the projects.
It is not only necessary to incorporate a CIAO when your AI needs have become sufficient to require one planning for future requirements is smart in a world where generative AI is only becoming more ubiquitous. If your company has plans to expand AI development, integrate more generative AI into your existing tech stack, or make AI a central component of your product, then considering the need for a CAIO as early as possible is a good idea.
Since the roles of CAIO, CTO, CDO and CIO often overlap, it’s paramount to make sure that the people filling these roles work smoothly and efficiently together. In the case that more than one of these positions is filled by a single person, it may be necessary to ensure that tasks are appropriately delegated in order to avoid overburdening and burnout.
As with any executive-level leader, leadership style, ethics, communication style and mission should be evaluated before any appointments are made. AI is a highly sensitive topic, and any executive tasked with dealing with implementing it should be aware of the implications for existing employees as well as customers.
There are not many roadmaps to guide businesses through forays into this new world. Fortunately, there are companies who specialize in AI-powered solutions and custom AI software development plans. Looping in a third-party provider to oversee development, assist in creating a plan, or knowledge share about their own CAIO implementation is an invaluable step in appointing a CAIO.
Alternatively, outsourcing your AI needs to a third-party software development company may be the way to go if managing the AI requirements of your company turns out to be too much for your teams to handle on their own.
App security concerns are nothing new. As an app developer, safeguarding your users’ data is perhaps one of your most significant duties. Nonetheless, numerous companies are questioning whether and in what ways app security has evolved with the widespread adoption of cloud-based development. With the increasing demands on cloud app security, developers have started to rely on cloud service providers to protect their applications and infrastructure from any external threats.
The ubiquity of cloud services in app development has changed security concerns somewhat. Applications are now composed of many different cloud services, linked together by APIs and network requests, and each link in that chain creates a new security concern.
Cloud app security is the set of processes and procedures used to secure applications that operate primarily in the cloud. Modern applications are spread across a variety of cloud platforms, from things like Google Workspaces to AWS instances, to hybrid systems that combine both on-premises resources and multiple cloud services.
Cloud app security strives to protect every potential weakness in a multi-cloud environment, at every stage of the development lifecycle. Apps need to be protected not only while transferring data in production, but also while running automated tests in hosted environments and deploying via online repositories. User permissions need to be limited, and developer permissions also need to be limited.
Identity management and tightly controlled user permissions is the first step in securing a cloud-based application. Tiered permissions hierarchies ensure that the number of people able to access an application at any point is limited to only those that need access.
Enforcing strong passwords is the most important thing you can do to ensure proper identity management. Automatically generating strong passwords and using password managers to store those passwords is the most effective way of protecting users and your organization from data leaks.
Multi Factor Authentication is crucial, especially for developers and other organization members who work on an application. Nearly all major cloud platforms require MFA these days, and enforcing MFA use among your employees will go a long way in protecting weak points in an application.
The Principle of Least Privilege (PoLP) is a security concept that grants users the lowest necessary level of access. Only give users access to resources they absolutely need. Cloud storage makes it very easy to overshare resources via URLs, but this opens up more potentiality for bad actors to access those resources.
Zombie accounts that sit unmonitored for extended periods of time are vulnerable to attack. Hackers might seize these accounts and use them to get behind security walls, send phishing emails to both users and employees, and more.
Data leaks and compromised credentials are a major source of security concern. It is very easy to monitor user activity these days with click tracking and other data-collecting methods. As well as using this data for business analysis, you should also be monitoring it for possible security breaches.
Beyond those foundational measures, there are further strategies organizations can implement to ensure cloud applications don’t fall victim to online attacks.
Implement reCAPTCHA to minimize harmful traffic. This free service can be employed at different stages of the authentication process to lessen the impact of malicious traffic. At a minimum, it should be used on web forms, particularly username and password forms, or forms that contain other sensitive data like credit card information.
The terms authorization and authentication are frequently confused, but they actually refer to different concepts. Authentication is the process of confirming a user’s identity, ensuring that they are who they claim to be. This can be achieved through methods such as multi-factor authentication (MFA), entering a password, answering a security question, or a combination of these approaches.
Authorization determines what the authenticated user has access to. This is managed by permission controls and the Principle of Least Permission. Authenticated users should have access only to those resources granted by their permission level.
It is critical to understand the difference between authentication and authorization and to use both procedures in tandem to effectively secure a system.
Minimizing the attack surface area is not always possible, as in a multi-cloud environment there are many entry points that can introduce weaknesses to the system. The easiest way to minimize the attack surface area is to use as few services as possible and keep as much traffic as possible behind secured routes.
Monitoring the attack surface area can be done via something like Crowdstrike, which can be deployed to cloud environments and containers to continuously watch for suspicious activity. This makes it more difficult for attackers to hide, and also more costly for them to launch an attack.
It should go without saying that all sensitive user data should be encrypted in your databases and while in-transit on your network.
All of these methods together will serve to reinforce security on your system and strengthen your API. This is particularly important if you plan to make your API public or expose certain endpoints. These days, opening your API and charging other enterprise customers for access to your functionality is a big part of online business – but before you can think about doing that you must ensure that all parts of your system are secure.
As cybersecurity threats are on the rise, the importance of security testing grows ever more crucial. Security testing companies are essential in uncovering vulnerabilities and potential issues within applications. They employ methods like security audits and penetration testing to reduce risks and safeguard against reputational harm.
To keep cloud applications secure, developers must continuously implement strong security measures, including cloud app security. Protecting user data is crucial in today’s cloud-centric environment. Utilize cloud provider security features, enforce strong identity management, and monitor for vulnerabilities. Enhance security with encryption, API protection, and professional security testing. As digital threats evolve, adapt your cloud app security strategies to maintain user trust.
In 2016, the volume of traffic from mobile devices on the web surpassed desktop traffic. In 2018, mobile comprised over 50% of website traffic, with desktops holding about 45% and tablets making up the remaining 4%. Today, more than 59% of website traffic comes from mobile devices, and 92% of internet users access the web using a mobile device this is why it is imperative to use specific approaches for each mobile app development project.
For CEOs and app developers, optimizing online presence for mobile is critical. But it’s no longer enough to simply build a responsive website: these days, users expect an experience seamlessly integrated with their devices—something that a website alone simply cannot provide. This is why more and more businesses are turning to mobile app development to meet user expectations.
Get our detailed mobile app development checklist now to guarantee a seamless and successful launch!
Download NowMobile applications are transforming daily life by making it more convenient and reliable. They not only help businesses stay competitive but also drive customer retention and enable global audience outreach.
There are three primary approaches to mobile app development: native development, hybrid development, and progressive web app development. Each approach offers distinct advantages depending on factors like performance, cost, and user experience.
Native Apps are built with OS-specific programming languages and tools—meaning an app developed for iOS will run only on an iOS device, and an app developed for Android will run only on Android. They are downloaded and installed from app stores and operate independently from the browser.
Native apps are more costly to develop because they require engineers with skills in OS-specific languages like Swift, Gradle, and Objective C, and because a separate version of the app will need to be built for each platform (iOS, Android, etc.)
The benefit of native apps is that they allow for richer features to be built because they interface directly with the device in the device’s native language, meaning all hardware features of the device can be easily accessed and utilized. When developed properly, they also run more reliably than hybrid apps.
Hybrid Apps are built using platform-agnostic tools and frameworks that can run on any OS. Frequently, hybrid apps are written in C# (Xamarin, NET Maui) or a combination of JavaScript and HTML (Flutter, React Native.) The code is compiled and run by the device, interfacing with the native modules via plugins.
Hybrid apps are more accessible to develop and can often be built by savvy front-end engineers (especially those familiar with React and JavaScript.) There is no need to create multiple versions of the same app. The drawback is that some device features cannot be accessed (or are difficult to access) and the app may have a higher instance of bugs and run less reliably than a native application
Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are websites that behave like apps. They cannot be downloaded from an app store and operate solely within the browser. However, they offer an enhanced experience for the user over a normal website.
PWAs frequently make use of a device’s local storage to save user preferences and data, and to allow for offline use. The benefit of PWAs over native or hybrid apps is that PWAs do not require lengthy release cycles or app review every time a patch or update needs to be made. The drawback is they have limited functionality and usually run less efficiently than native applications.
Cross-platform development enables the creation of apps that work on multiple platforms, eliminating the need to build separate applications for each mobile operating system. This can be accomplished using frameworks such as React Native, Xamarin, or Flutter.
By allowing developers to make changes once and apply them across all platforms, cross-platform development significantly reduces development time and costs.
RMAD is a recent innovation that accelerates mobile app development by utilizing low-code development tools to streamline the process.
RMAD platforms streamline app development, cutting costs and complexity while providing a high ROI by supporting multiple projects. These tools allow organizations to hire developers with minimal coding experience, rapidly prototype apps, and reduce the need for traditional development skills.
Choosing the appropriate software product development environment and tech stack, keeping in mind the target audience, and clearly outlining your business’s specific goals for the application can make the difference between a successful and unsuccessful mobile app development project.
Each approach to mobile app development has its benefits and drawbacks, and no one approach is necessarily better than the others. The approach you choose will largely depend on the resources you have available and the functionality you need. Do you have engineers who know Swift and Java? Do you have time to build two separate versions of the same app? If not, you may be better off sticking with a hybrid approach or progressive web app than undertaking the task of developing a native application.
The term “web portal development” has been popping up more frequently in searches recently, and business owners may be concerned that they don’t understand what it means. “Web portal” sounds like a new type of technology that might require complex and difficult to learn skills, but in fact, it’s really just another way of saying “progressive web app.”
Businesses in today’s online environment can certainly benefit from understanding what a web portal is and why they might need one to better connect with their customers.
Web portal development is the process of developing an interactive app for your business that users can access via the web. A web portal is different from a website in that a website is typically a set of static, read-only pages, while a web portal offers users the ability to input data, make changes, and interact with content.
A web portal is more commonly referred to as a “progressive web app” (PWA.) There are many types of web portals and web apps, all of which serve specific purposes and meet the needs of businesses and their users in specific ways. Here are just a few examples of the types of portals a web-based company might offer.
The requirements for building a web portal will vary depending on what you want the web portal to do. There are various types of web apps that allow your customers to access your products in different ways.
Web portal development these days is frequently done by linking multiple cloud services to provide the various pieces of functionality required to meet user needs. Organizations with the capability to build their own systems also use various programming languages and frameworks to code different parts of their platform. These days, many web apps are composed of a mix of cloud platforms and in-house solutions.
Some easy-to-use, no-code solutions for building web portals include:
Some more advanced tools for those with coding skills or access to web developers include:
The cost of building a web portal will vary greatly depending on your needs. Setting up a complete e-commerce solution, for example, will cost you more than implementing a simple portal to allow users to view information about your business.
In general, it is estimated that the cost of building a basic web app with a simple interface can cost anywhere from $10,000 to $25,000.
There are many benefits to having a web portal for your business.
There are really no downsides to increasing your online presence with a functional web app. Consider getting started with a service like Wix or Squarespace, or work with a software partner to find top-quality software developers that can design and build a custom app from scratch.
Gen AI now impacts every corner of our economy, from healthcare to entertainment to the tech industry, and the world of sports is no exception to this rule. Generative AI is already making its way into analytics, training, content production, coaching, and fan engagement in ways that will change the sports industry from here on out.
Here is a broad overview of the ways in which AI is already being implemented in the world of sports technology:
There’s no doubt that as artificial intelligence becomes increasingly more powerful, we will only uncover more use cases for its application to sports and sports software development.
Artificial intelligence can be integrated into sports tech in a staggeringly vast number of ways—into both consumer facing and internal software.
The NFL, for example, has partnered with AWS (Amazon Web Services) to create an AI-powered app called Digital Athlete, which tracks athletes’ performances and gives an organization a more complete understanding of that athlete’s experience. This allows coaches to create tailored training programs, medical professionals to administer better-targeted injury treatment, and can even go so far as to recommend what shoes are best.
Other AI-powered sports tech is allowing teams to analyze players’ past performances to help them make better draft picks, or more lucrative trade deals. Consumer-facing tech provides fans with custom experiences, and AI chatbots quickly summarize training data, reducing the amount of time coaches need to spend reviewing film footage or going through sprint times.
Generative AI is already being woven into fan applications to improve their experience across the board:
On the other side of the glass, sports teams are already incorporating AI into their management workflows to streamline all aspects of operations.
Recruiting top talent is arguably the way a sports organization succeeds. The ability to analyze player data in order to enhance talent identification and scouting is incredibly valuable, as is risk assessment for things like a player’s susceptibility to injury and other health conditions.
Analyzing players’ biometric information also allows organizations to create better training programs, optimize performance with injury management and prevention.
By supporting these operational functions, generative AI can help streamline processes, improve the accuracy of forecasting, and create efficiencies that allow sports organizations to focus more on core activities and strategic goals.
Incorporating generative AI into sports tech offers major benefits, but several risks may make it unviable for some organizations. High implementation costs, privacy and data security concerns, and potential biases in decision-making are significant obstacles. Ethical issues, such as player autonomy, job displacement, and challenges with AI’s unpredictable performance in sports, add complexity. Additionally, technical expertise requirements, resistance from fans, players, and staff, and the risk of over-reliance on AI insights further caution against adoption.
Key challenges in adopting generative AI for sports tech include:
While there’s no doubt that artificial intelligence is incredibly powerful, it’s no replacement for the human aspect of sports. While AI can summarize and analyze data, it can’t replace the real-world experience of a coach, who can evaluate an athlete’s physical and mental health in real time.
Incorporating generative AI into sports tech has tremendous potential but requires careful consideration. The ways in which AI can enhance and influence sports are already numerous and varied. We expect only to see more ways this incredible technology continues to change things in the coming years. Organizations need to weigh the benefits against these risks, invest in the necessary oversight, and build systems that balance technological advancements with human-centered practices to maximize positive impact while mitigating potential downsides. We expect only to see more ways this incredible technology continues to change things in the coming years. AI could be a valuable tool that enhances the experience of sports for everyone involved.
There’s an old saying that goes, “Ideas are a dime a dozen,” and nowhere is that truer than in the world of mobile apps. It feels like everyone, and their mom today is building a mobile app. The space is crowded just like all other online spaces and standing out takes more than just a good idea.
Mobile users these days are savvy: they don’t tolerate poorly performing apps. Implementation is key and will not only help your app rise to the top in a sea of sluggish, buggy, low-quality apps, but will help it stay there for years to come.
The best way to ensure that your mobile app is high-quality and ready to be put in front of users is by testing your mobile apps rigorously. In this article, we’ll talk about the various ways you can test mobile apps, as well as how to build with scalability and future-proofing in mind.
Mobile app testing involves evaluating and validating your mobile application to assess its usability, performance, and scalability before it is released to the market.
This is the most basic, and some would argue, necessary, testing you will do on your mobile app. Determine that the things you built in the UI work. Much of this can and should be handled by writing automated unit tests that run every time the app is deployed.
This is the most important type of testing for future-proofing your app. You need to understand how it performs under various types of loads and conditions.
Load testing determines whether the app performs as expected under various user loads. You should test the app under normal traffic conditions and under peak expected traffic conditions. This will help you find bottlenecks and performance issues.
This type of testing helps you figure out what loads your app should be expected to take. It will tell you the maximum number of users the app will support before performance begins to degrade. This is one of the best ways to figure out how and when to start scaling, and to set up load tests.
Volume testing is similar to capacity testing, but it refers specifically to the way data flows through the app. It lets you understand how the app handles data under various loads, and what happens to the data if things go wrong.
Spike testing and stress testing measure the app’s performance under high-stress situations, such as a sudden influx of users.
Network testing allows you to test your app under various network conditions. Remember: not all users have access to high-speed internet. Knowing how your app performs under less-than-ideal network conditions allows you to better understand the experience that all your users are having.
Building a highly performant mobile app requires rigorous testing, but testing mobile applications isn’t always easy. From simulating network conditions to mocking user loads, testing can be complicated to get right.
It’s not easy to account for every type of condition your app may encounter. Users access the web in a variety of different ways: 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, another mobile phone’s hotspot. Simulating all types of network conditions is tedious but necessary if you want to make sure all users are having a good experience.
There are many different ways to do mobile app development: from native implementations like Swift for iOS or Gradle for Android, to React Native or Flutter, which allow you to build cross-platform apps that work on multiple platforms. Regardless of whether your app is proprietary or cross-platform, you will need to make sure it performs as expected on any platforms it is supposed to work on.
Determine what metrics you need to measure before you begin the design process. You’ll want to build user tracking and click-capturing methods into the UI. Figuring out what to track at the end, after the app has been built, will cause you to miss out on a lot of valuable data.
Just because testing has been implemented, doesn’t mean it will be easy to track down the root causes of some problems. Automated testing can only take you so far in some cases, you will just need to have QA or developers sit down and manually debug an issue.
Testing particularly performance testing is the best way to future-proof your mobile applications and rise to the top in a crowded space. It will make sure that the app you release to end users is robust and secure and delivers a high-quality experience to all types of users every single time.
“Fail fast” was a phrase coined by Mark Zuckerberg to describe Facebook’s approach to agile software development. Since the phrase became part of the lexicon, it and Zuckerberg have been scrutinized for the seemingly throwaway attitude it promotes.
But “fail fast” still has its place in agile software development. The “fail fast, fail early” mentality encourages devs and product teams to test their assumptions, iterate quickly, listen to customer feedback, and constantly reinvent and revise their product to meet growing expectations.
Fail Fast is a principle in agile software development that involves testing your software application ideas and assumptions early, before deployment. This method entails evaluating small ideas in segments to assess performance, thereby preventing high costs and significant failures later.
Building software is expensive. The up-front cost of software development is high if you want a good, quality product with few crashes, high availability, robust security, and a responsive interface. So, it is important to ensure that before you invest in all that work, you are building something people want.
While market research and studying previous examples of what you are making is important, there really is no way to know how customers will respond to your product until you put it in front of them. So, you need to put it in front of them as early in the process as possible.
An MVP (Minimum Viable Product) or a prototype that encapsulates the core features of your product in a way that users can test and respond to is one of the most valuable steps to incorporate into your build cycle.
Not only does getting something in front of users early help you figure out exactly what you should be building, it also helps you discover potential pitfalls and technical issues. The tech stack you’ve chosen might not quite fit the requirements of the product. Your devs may not be familiar with the tools you’ve chosen. There may be additional scoping that needs to happen to flesh out features that turn out to be more complicated than expected.
If you get your MVP or prototype together, only to put it in front of customers and realize it doesn’t work or worse, if you can’t even get the MVP or prototype built because the technical challenges are too difficult to overcome, guess what? That’s a good thing.
It’s far better to spend a few weeks mocking up a prototype or building a very basic version of your product than it is to spend months on a new feature, only to release it and have it failed.
It may seem counterintuitive that building something that doesn’t work saves you money—after all, wasn’t all that time spent building the product wasted? Wasn’t the money you paid the devs to build it wasted? Well, yes, kind of. But the amount of money you could have spent building something bigger and more complicated that also failed is far higher.
Not only that, you gained valuable insight into the needs and expectations of your customers—and that is incredibly valuable data that will be useful not only on your second iteration of this project, but on every single new feature you build down the road.
Of course. Once you’ve built an MVP or prototype that failed, you not only gain valuable knowledge about how to fix the product, but you’re also starting that second iteration with the experience MVP development behind you. Features can be scrapped or scoped back. The tech stack can be streamlined. Communication about expectations can happen more efficiently.
Infusing your company culture with the “fail fast” mentality is an excellent way to help devs and product teams recover from failure. The expectation of agile software development is that not everything will work, and we treat failure as a learning experience. Making this clear from the get-go allows teams to see the failure as a positive, recover quickly and move on, rather than dwelling on the failure as a negative.
“Fail fast, fail early” can be an incredibly powerful mindset to instill in your software development team. It allows you to build quickly, encourages you to test often, puts you in touch with users, and saves you time and money in the long run.
There is an old saying that goes something along the lines of, “Cheap, fast, good–pick two. You can’t have all three.” While this is an over-simplification of the nuances of custom software development, there is some truth in it. It is exceedingly difficult to build good, quality software quickly and cheaply.
For decades, market competition pushed software development companies to prioritize “fast and cheap” at the expense of “good.” Beating a rival company to market and building a product for as little up-front cost as possible have become custom software development’s driving forces. But the tide is changing.
These days, people recognize that prioritizing long-term value over short-term cost is not only better for business, but also better for your brand, company morale, and (not to get too metaphysical) the world. So, let’s look at how prioritizing value over cost can save you money in the long run and improve your product and make your whole company stronger.
The difference between long-term value and short-term cost may seem obvious long-term value is the benefit you will reap from your software in the coming years, and short-term cost is what it takes to produce it up-front. Figuring out your ROI requires careful planning and meticulous attention to detail to balance these two concerns.
Long-term value includes more than just financial ROI. A quality product boosts your brand’s value in the eyes of existing and potential customers. Users today expect speedy data processing, robust security, and a snappy interface. But they also want a software company to deliver things like fair business practices and a commitment to environmental sustainability.
And long-term value doesn’t only mean value to the customer. A codebase that is easy to deal with because developers spend time up-front planning for flexibility will save time for software developers down the road. A software development cycle that includes automated testing and deployment will take your engineers more time to set up initially but will make future revisions and new features easier to implement.
When you focus solely on the cost of producing software, you set yourself up to lose out on potential ROI. Hiring less-experienced developers, cutting short the timeframe for development, rushing to deploy without testing, or skipping meetings about the exact specifications of the product can all lead to failures. At best, these failures end up costing you more time to fix later. At worst, they tank your product.
But not all cost-cutting strategies are bad. Some cost-cutting methods limiting the scope of features, simplifying the UI, or using less-expensive technologies in your SaaS tech-stack can actually be beneficial in the long run. It’s up to you and your product team to decide how to balance these concerns and make difficult choices up front.
Technical debt is one of the most expensive hidden costs of software development. Technical debt is created any time a developer touches the codebase. As soon as you change a line of code, you have created technical debt. Some debt is small, it can be relieved simply by adding a unit test to ensure the new code doesn’t break the old code. Other debt is large, a legacy codebase that needs a massive refactor, or proprietary systems that need to be updated or moved to the cloud.
Measuring software quality mitigates technical debt and is paramount to ensuring quality products that don’t end up costing you down the road. Here are some of the metrics you can use to measure software quality.
Total code churn measures how many lines of code have been changed in the codebase during a specific time period, such as a release cycle or a sprint. “Changed” code includes anything added, modified, or deleted. A codebase’s total code churn has a direct impact on how much technical debt is generated.
The MTTD measures how long it takes a dev or support team to detect and respond to issues in the codebase. A low MTTD means low technical debt and indicates that you have a responsive and efficient system.
The crash rate is how frequently the system crashes. A crash is a complete failure of the system that prevents a user from using any of the features.
This is also referred to as “uptime vs downtime.” System availability measures how accessible the system is to users and can be affected by things like crashes, security breaches, or devs taking the system offline to upgrade portions of it or fix errors.
The MTBF measures the average amount of time a system is operational between crashes, errors, or downtime.
Your UI/UX is one of the most important parts of your system. It is the thing users will see and interact with most often. So, it pays to invest in the cost up front to make the UI slick and responsive. If you focus solely on cutting costs, you may end up with a user interface that is slow to load, glitchy, or simply unattractive, and while it may be tempting to brush these concerns off, the reality is that a good UI/UX design will do more for your brand and relationship with customers than any other part of your business.
Likewise, cutting costs up front also impacts the sustainability of your application. When you cut costs, you are more likely to incur technical debt, and the more technical debt builds up, the more it costs to bring it down. High technical debt will also put off experienced developers and quality software development services, who will not want to work on a difficult codebase.
Prioritizing long-term value over short-term cost results in quality products that are beloved by customers. Not only that, but you will also attract higher quality, more experienced developers if your product is well constructed, low in technical debt, and easy to maintain.
Outsourcing software development can be a great way to increase productivity if you have limited ability to scale. Human capital is an expensive resource, and hiring is a time-consuming process that diverts human capital away from engineering.
There are many reasons to consider outsourcing software development services, but there are also drawbacks and pitfalls to watch out for. In this article, we’ll look at why you may want to outsource, when it makes sense to do so, and when to hold off.
Outsourcing software development doesn’t just mean hiring a third party to build your app. All stages of the development lifecycle can be outsourced
It’s beneficial to do an assessment of your business and current structure before looking into outsourcing software development. An assessment will help you determine what your goals are, how those goals will be measured, what your budget constraints are, and your projected timeline.
While there are any benefits to outsourcing, there are also downsides. Whether or not the benefits outweigh the risks will come down to your business’s specific goals and requirements.
Your hiring pool may be limited by your geographic region. Outsourcing partners typically find engineers from all over the world. You may need to be open to taking on remote employees, but this is a fair tradeoff to get top talent from a larger pool.
Your engineers and designers will no longer be putting out fires or spending time on trivial or menial tasks. Outsourcing things like QA, bug fixes, and maintenance allows your employees to work on designing and building new features, scaling, and improving the product.
Low-cost outsourced labor increases your efficiency and productivity.
Scaling your outsourced workforce is easy: your outsourcing partner can handle this for you. You won’t need to spend time attracting and interviewing talent, you can simply leave this to your partner.
Outsourcing requires you to open up parts of your company and codebase to outside people. It’s imperative that you protect your customer’s data and your own data. Make sure security measures are up to par before bringing on any outside help.
The people you hire through software product development services will never be as passionate about the product as your internal employees. However, they should still align with your company culture. Spend some time with your outsourcing partner outlining your mission statement and core values.
Although outsourcing is typically less costly than hiring new people, there can be hidden costs, such as communication lag, unmotivated outside employees, and misunderstandings that lead to breakdowns.
You should also take into consideration the experience of your software development partner and look at customer reviews to evaluate their performance.
You should also take into consideration the experience of your software outsourcing partner and look at customer reviews to evaluate their performance.
Choosing the right software outsourcing partner is a critical decision which can impact the success of your software project. Here are some of our recommended software outsourcing companies in USA: